AI-Assisted Educator Performance Scoring from Student Growth
What it is for
- Allocates seats in NYC public schools — a public benefit — across 3-K, pre-K, Gifted & Talented, middle school, and high school admissions.
- Operates the centralized admissions pipeline and school directory for NYC Public Schools.
- Run by
- New York City Public Schools
- Where
- No fixed location
- Kept
- Not stated by the NYC Office of Technology and Innovation.
- Shared with
- Me, Accountable organization, Vendor
This system uses student assessment scores and demographic data to estimate how much each student was expected to learn, then compares those predictions to actual scores to generate a growth rating for teachers and principals. That rating — the Measures of Student Learning (MOSL) — is combined with an observation-based rating to produce an annual Overall Rating for each educator. Under New York State law, this Overall Rating is a significant factor in decisions about employment, tenure, and salary.
What it is for
NYC Public Schools' admissions matching engine. Uses the Gale–Shapley deferred-acceptance algorithm to assign students to seats across 3-K, pre-K, Gifted & Talented, middle school, and high school applications.
What it collects and what happens to it
Data taken in
- Student biographical information (home address, poverty status, home language), academic information (course grades, state test scores), and school records (sending school). FERPA-protected.
- The family's ranked list of school choices, submitted via the family-facing MySchools portal.
Processing
- Gale–Shapley deferred-acceptance algorithm. Students and programs are tentatively matched in iterative rounds — students propose, programs accept or reject based on their priority ordering, and the algorithm terminates when every student is matched or has exhausted their listed choices. The same family of algorithms is used by the National Resident Matching Program.
What it does
- The matching algorithm decides the school assignment for each applicant; schools and families then execute the resulting enrollment. Runs daily during admissions cycles under DIIT monitoring.
Outputs
- A binding school match per student — the seat the algorithm assigned, which feeds enrollment confirmation.
Run by
- Accountable agency. Operated by the Division of Instructional and Information Technology (DIIT), which is taking over the system from the vendor as the current contract winds down.
Built by
- Vendor that designed and implemented the algorithmic matching functionality under a 5-year professional-services contract; work is transitioning in-house to DIIT.
Kept for
Not stated by the NYC Office of Technology and Innovation.
Shared with
- Students and their families see their own application status and matched school in the family-facing MySchools portal.
- NYC Public Schools accesses the data through the school-facing portal and the administrative portal.
- Blenderbox has access for the duration of its design / implementation contract; access is expected to be wound down as DIIT takes over operation.
Stored
Not stated by the NYC Office of Technology and Innovation.
How to read the colours
Can it identify you?
- Anonymized data
- Data about people with the link to who is broken. Stripped of identifiers, blurred, aggregated, or noised so this system can’t reasonably tie a record back to an individual.
- Pseudonymous data
- Each person’s data is tied to a token (hash, ID, template) that lets this system recognise the same person across events, but the token itself doesn’t reveal a name. Reidentification is possible with extra information.
- Identifiable data
- The data either contains a direct identifier (name, address, account name, recognisable face or voice, plate number) or carries a token this system uses to look up legal identity during processing.
Who completes the loop?
- Human decides
- This mode suggests; a person decides what to do next. The AI is always advisory — a human is in the loop on every decision. Example: a triage tool ranks cases for a clinician who chooses which to see first.
- Human executes
- This mode decides; a person carries out the result. Example: an optimizer plans the day’s trash-collection routes, and drivers run them.
- Autonomous
- This mode decides and acts on its own. No person reviews each decision or carries out the resulting action.
Definitions from the DTPR standard. Amber is about your data, violet about who decides. The fuller the shape and the deeper the colour, the more identifying the data or the less a person is involved.
- AI registerNYC Algorithmic Tools Compliance Report (2025) — MySchools – MatchYear: 2025. Agency: NYC Public Schools. Department: Division of Instructional and Information Technology. Date first use: 2018/08. Source CSV provided by user.
- Register entryPublished by the NYC Office of Technology and Innovation. Reference e57d8180. Schema: ai@2026-05-06-beta
What you can do
Ask about this system
Questions go to the NYC Office of Technology and Innovation, not the vendor.
Your rights
- Right to Be Informed of AI UseNYC publishes the use of an algorithmic matching system in the annual algorithmic-tools compliance report and in family-facing application materials.
- Right to Algorithmic TransparencyA plain-language description of the Gale–Shapley deferred-acceptance procedure is published in the public algorithmic-tools compliance report and on NYC Public Schools enrollment-support pages.
- Right to AccessFamilies have FERPA-grounded rights to access education records held by NYC Public Schools, including the data used as inputs to the match.
- Right to Correct Your DataFamilies have FERPA-grounded rights to correct inaccurate education records held by NYC Public Schools. Corrected inputs should be re-fed into the match where eligibility windows allow.
- Right to a Human ReviewStandard NYC Public Schools appeals processes exist for individual admissions decisions; applicants can request human review of a match outcome.
Risks and safeguards
No risks or safeguards have been published for this system yet.