AI-Assisted Acoustic Gunshot Detection for Emergency Response
What it is for
- ShotSpotter provides acoustic gunshot detection to assist with emergency call response, alerting patrol units to potential gunfire and enhancing investigations involving firearms.
- Activations may result in evidence collection that can enhance case investigations, and problematic locations identified through alerts may require additional resource deployment and further police investigations.
- Run by
- New York Police Department (NYPD)
- Where
- No fixed location
- Kept
- Not stated by the NYC Office of Technology and Innovation.
- Shared with
- Accountable organization, Vendor
- Your copy
- You cannot see the data it holds about you. What you can do
What it is for
ShotSpotter is an acoustic gunshot detection system deployed by the NYPD that listens for sounds in public spaces and classifies them as potential gunfire. When a potential gunshot is detected, the system pinpoints the location and routes the incident to human acoustic experts for confirmation before police are notified. The system has been in use since 2015 and does not collect identifying information about individuals, though activations may result in evidence collection used in investigations.
What it collects and what happens to it
Data taken in
- Acoustic audio signals captured by sensors deployed across geographic areas are analyzed for characteristics consistent with gunshots. No identifying information about individuals is collected or disclosed.
- The system operates across defined geographic spaces monitored by the sensor network, using location data to triangulate the source of detected sounds.
Processing
- The system classifies audio signals to determine whether they represent potential gunfire. This is the core computation type described in the register (Classification). Classified incidents are not acted upon automatically — they are forwarded to acoustic experts for human review.
What it does
- Specialized software analyzes audio signals from microphones deployed in geographic areas to detect and locate potential gunshot sounds, converting raw acoustic input into structured incident detections.
- The system classifies detected sounds as potential gunfire and determines the location of the sound source. Classified incidents are then routed to human acoustic experts for additional analysis before any notification is sent.
Outputs
- The tool determines the location of the sound source — a geographic coordinate or address — which is included in incident reports sent to acoustic experts and ultimately to patrol units upon confirmation.
- Once classified as potential gunfire, the system sends an incident report to acoustic experts for additional analysis. Notifications for confirmed gunfire are then sent to police units — an advisory chain where humans confirm before action is taken.
Run by
- The NYPD deploys and operates ShotSpotter to support patrol operations and emergency call response involving potential gunfire incidents across New York City.
Built by
- ShotSpotter is the proprietary software vendor that developed and maintains the acoustic gunshot detection system. Training data is proprietary to the vendor. The engagement is classified as procurement and professional services.
Kept for
Not stated by the NYC Office of Technology and Innovation.
Shared with
- Incident data, alert notifications, and location information generated by ShotSpotter are available to the NYPD for emergency response, patrol operations, and case investigations.
- The vendor (ShotSpotter) developed and maintains the software, and holds proprietary training data. The extent to which the vendor retains access to audio signals or incident data processed through the system is not specified in the register.
- No identifying information about individuals is collected or disclosed by the system. Members of the public in monitored areas cannot access the audio data or incident records generated about their geographic area through any direct self-service mechanism described in the register.
Stored
Not stated by the NYC Office of Technology and Innovation.
How to read the colours
Can it identify you?
- Anonymized data
- Data about people with the link to who is broken. Stripped of identifiers, blurred, aggregated, or noised so this system can’t reasonably tie a record back to an individual.
- Pseudonymous data
- Each person’s data is tied to a token (hash, ID, template) that lets this system recognise the same person across events, but the token itself doesn’t reveal a name. Reidentification is possible with extra information.
- Identifiable data
- The data either contains a direct identifier (name, address, account name, recognisable face or voice, plate number) or carries a token this system uses to look up legal identity during processing.
Who completes the loop?
- Human decides
- This mode suggests; a person decides what to do next. The AI is always advisory — a human is in the loop on every decision. Example: a triage tool ranks cases for a clinician who chooses which to see first.
- Human executes
- This mode decides; a person carries out the result. Example: an optimizer plans the day’s trash-collection routes, and drivers run them.
- Autonomous
- This mode decides and acts on its own. No person reviews each decision or carries out the resulting action.
Definitions from the DTPR standard. Amber is about your data, violet about who decides. The fuller the shape and the deeper the colour, the more identifying the data or the less a person is involved.
- AI registerNYC Algorithmic Tools Compliance Report — ShotSpotterNew York City, Algorithmic Tools Compliance Report, row nyc__row__76c82898bf5a, reported 2025.
- AI registerNYC Algorithmic Tools Compliance Report — ShotSpotter
- AI registerNYC Algorithmic Tools Compliance Report — ShotSpotter
- AI registerNYC Algorithmic Tools Compliance Report — ShotSpotter
- AI registerNYC Algorithmic Tools Compliance Report — ShotSpotter
- AI registerNYC Algorithmic Tools Compliance Report — ShotSpotter
- AI registerNYC Algorithmic Tools Compliance Report — ShotSpotter
- AI registerNYC Algorithmic Tools Compliance Report — ShotSpotter
- AI registerNYC Algorithmic Tools Compliance Report — ShotSpotter
- AI registerNYC Algorithmic Tools Compliance Report — ShotSpotter
- AI registerNYC Algorithmic Tools Compliance Report — ShotSpotter
- AI registerNYC Algorithmic Tools Compliance Report — ShotSpotter
- AI registerNYC Algorithmic Tools Compliance Report — ShotSpotter
- AI registerNYC Algorithmic Tools Compliance Report — ShotSpotter
- AI registerNYC Algorithmic Tools Compliance Report — ShotSpotter
- AI registerNYC Algorithmic Tools Compliance Report — ShotSpotter
- AI registerNYC Algorithmic Tools Compliance Report — ShotSpotter
- AI registerNYC Algorithmic Tools Compliance Report — ShotSpotter
- AI registerNYC Algorithmic Tools Compliance Report — ShotSpotter
- Register entryPublished by the NYC Office of Technology and Innovation. Reference 40b205ec. This disclosure was drafted with AI assistance.Schema: ai@2026-05-06-beta
What you can do
Ask about this system
Questions go to the NYC Office of Technology and Innovation, not the vendor.
Your rights
- Right to Algorithmic TransparencyMembers of the public may request information about algorithmic tools used by the NYPD through New York City's public records process (FOIL). The NYC Algorithmic Tools Compliance Report is publicly available and discloses the existence and purpose of this system. Training data is noted as proprietary to the vendor, limiting full transparency about the model's logic.
- Right to Be Informed of AI UseThe existence of ShotSpotter sensors and the system's operation in specific NYC neighborhoods is publicly disclosed through the NYC Algorithmic Tools Compliance Report. Individuals in monitored areas are not given real-time notice that acoustic monitoring is occurring, as the system is a passive environmental sensor network rather than an interactive system.
Risks and safeguards
- Civil liberties harmAcoustic surveillance of public spaces may have a chilling effect on lawful assembly and movement, and persistent monitoring of specific geographic areas may disproportionately affect certain communities. The system operates across defined geographic spaces and activations may trigger police deployment and evidence collection, raising concerns about over-policing in monitored areas.Safeguard: The system routes all potential gunshot detections to human acoustic experts for review before any police notification is sent, ensuring a human is in the loop before action is taken. The register states no identifying information about individuals is collected or disclosed.
- Reputational harmFalse positive classifications by the system could lead to unwarranted police deployment to locations and, if evidence is collected, could affect individuals who are not connected to any gunfire incident. Misclassification of lawful sounds as gunshots may result in stigmatization of neighborhoods or individuals.Safeguard: The two-stage review process — AI classification followed by mandatory human acoustic expert confirmation — is intended to reduce false positives before any police notification or resource deployment is triggered.